The README and MIT license make the small wrapper easy to evaluate, while its two runtime dependencies keep dependency exposure low. The repository has no security policy or scanning, leaving maintenance issues harder to detect.
48%
Total Score
25
100
67
50
Only two releases exist, with the latest published over eight years ago and none in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a library dependency.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap. The repository is not archived, but there is no observed recent maintenance.
One registry maintainer is consistent with the user-owned repository, but it also indicates a thin publishing and support base. Combined with no recent activity, this increases continuity risk.
The repository has one star, one fork, and one watcher, indicating very limited outside attention. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but it provides little backup for a single-maintainer project.
Composer is used as the build tool, but no security scanning tools are present. Standard packaging is positive, while the missing scanning reduces maintenance assurance.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.