Clear tests, documentation, and a focused dependency set make the small library easy to inspect. Its workflow uses three unpinned actions, and the license metadata conflicts with the detected license file.
42%
Total Score
0
100
71
100
The package has only one release, published about four years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of abandonment for a library dependency, despite the repository remaining available.
The repository has had zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, reinforcing that maintenance has stopped rather than merely slowed.
A license file is present in both the artifact and repository, but the manifest declares MIT while the detected file is BSD-3-Clause. The mismatch creates a transparency concern even though the release is licensed.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool is configured. The missing scanning is a modest transparency and maintenance gap, not evidence of compromise.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, or audit findings. However, all three action references are unpinned, leaving the build exposed to upstream action changes.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nyholm/psr7 Version ^1.5 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.