Package Health

rarst/wps

The package has a clear README, MIT licensing, and a small, matching source tree. Its narrow development-only role may still suit projects that can accept a largely frozen dependency.

Latest 1.2PackagistPackagist

48%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

0

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

79

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

50

Health Score Breakdown

Release historydanger

The package has had only 3 releases since May 2016, with no release in over 7 years and none in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk, although the stable 1.2 version may be intentionally mature.

Repo commit activitydanger

The repository recorded 0 commits and 0 active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the long release gap. This materially increases abandonment risk.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer is used for the build, but no security scanning tooling was detected. That is a modest transparency and hygiene gap, not evidence that the release is unsafe by itself.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting vulnerabilities. For a development-only plugin this is a secondary concern, but it reduces maintenance transparency.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Andrey Savchenko

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
filp/whoops
Version ^2.3.1
—
—
pimple/pimple
Version ^3.2.3
—
—
composer/installers
Version ~1.6
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
7 years ago
Created
10 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform