rafaelddem/api_base

Consumer documentation is extremely thin, and the release has no license declaration or detected license. The repository also lacks security scanning and a security policy, leaving limited transparency for maintenance and responsible disclosure.

Latest v1.0.2

Packagist

43%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Release history

The latest release was published over three years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months; this is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite three historical releases.

Repo commit activity

The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, reinforcing the long release gap and indicating no current maintenance activity.

License

Neither the package metadata nor the artifact or repository contains a recognized license, leaving the legal terms for dependency use unclear.

Maintainers

Only one registry maintainer is listed. That is consistent with an individual-owned project, but it leaves little visible publishing redundancy when combined with inactive repository activity.

Package scaffolding

A README is present but contains only five characters, providing almost no integration guidance; the absence of tests and a changelog is normal packaging practice and is not a concern by itself.