The project includes tests, release notes, a clear license, and matching source documentation. Its release history is dormant, recent commit activity is absent, and its lone maintainer plus unpinned workflow actions add ongoing maintenance risk.
68%
Total Score
75
94
67
The registry lists one publisher account. With user-owned project backing, this is a thin maintainer base and leaves limited demonstrated redundancy.
Only two releases were published, both around 768 days ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This indicates a dormant release cadence and raises maintenance risk.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. This supports the broader evidence that maintenance has slowed or stopped.
No security policy is present. For a library with repository-backed development, this reduces transparency about vulnerability reporting and handling.
Both workflows were analyzed without audit findings or dangerous untrusted triggers, but all five action references are unpinned and one workflow grants top-level write access. These are workflow hygiene concerns, not severe risks on their own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.