The README says the code is not fully functional, and the repository has no security policy. Tests, a license, and a GitHub release provide useful structure, but the project has a very small audience and one publisher.
45%
Total Score
25
60
50
The latest release was about 2 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk, despite the package having eight releases overall.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the extended release gap and materially lowering confidence in ongoing maintenance.
Only one registry publisher is listed. For this user-owned repository, that indicates a thin maintainer base and increases bus-factor risk.
The repository has zero stars and zero forks, with one watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these values provide little evidence of community review or backup.
The linked repository has no security policy. For a library handling resilient data, this is a meaningful disclosure and maintenance gap, though it is not by itself evidence of unsafe code.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.