pushword/conversation
Its license, documentation, repository tests, and packaging are clear, with no install-time scripts. Organization backing adds continuity, though security-process visibility and contributor diversity are limited.
82%
Total Score
83
100
89
75
Health Score Breakdown
All 39 recent commits came from one contributor, so maintenance knowledge is concentrated. The organization-owned repository partly offsets the continuity concern but does not remove it.
The repository has 1 star, 0 forks, and 0 watchers. Low adoption is supporting evidence only, but it provides little independent validation of project maturity.
Composer is used as a build tool, but no security-scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and supply-chain hygiene gap.
The repository has no security policy. That limits visibility into how vulnerabilities are reported and handled, although it does not by itself indicate abandonment.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Robin D. |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 pushword/core Version * | — | — |
pushword/flat Version * | — | — |
symfony/http-client Version ^8.0 | — | — |
symfony/rate-limiter Version ^8.0 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 5 days ago
- Created
- 5 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.