Usable with caveats: the release is licensed, documented, non-deprecated, and backed by an active repository. However, only two releases exist across about two years, with no commits in the last three months and no security scanning or policy.
65%
Total Score
83
100
83
83
Only two releases have been published over about two years, with one release in the last 12 months. This is a thin release history and provides limited evidence of sustained maintenance.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Although a recent release and merged pull request provide some counterevidence, this still raises a meaningful maintenance-continuity concern.
The repository has only 3 stars, 1 fork, and 1 watcher. Low popularity is not disqualifying for a small module, but it offers little supporting evidence of broad community scrutiny.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools are configured. The missing scanning reduces supply-chain transparency without making the package unfit by itself.
The repository has no security policy. For a small calendar module this is a hygiene gap rather than a severe risk, but it leaves vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
silverstripe/cms Version ^6 | — | — |
silverstripe/framework Version ^6 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.