The MIT license, matching source tree, and organization-owned repository provide useful transparency. There are no tests, security policy, or security scanning tools, so maintenance expectations are limited.
56%
Total Score
75
81
50
The package has no README, tests, or changelog, reducing consumer guidance and verification. Missing tests and changelog are normal for a published artifact, but the absent README is a minor transparency gap for a theme package.
This package has only one release, published nearly three years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That leaves little evidence of ongoing maintenance.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the one-release history and indicating inactive maintenance.
Composer build tooling is present, but the repository has no security scanning tools. This is a hygiene gap rather than a severe dependency risk.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations unspecified. This lowers transparency but is not independently severe for this small package.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.