The package has had no release or repository commits for over a year, and its repository has no tests or security policy. It is licensed, stable, clearly linked to its package, and backed by an organization, which reduces—but does not remove—the maintenance concern.
62%
Total Score
75
100
83
75
The package has only three releases, with no releases in the last 12 months and a median interval of about 448 days. This indicates slow maintenance, though the package may be intentionally low-change.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the broader lack of recent releases and indicating reduced maintenance capacity.
The repository has no stars or forks and only six watchers. This is weak supporting evidence of adoption, but popularity alone does not establish that a small package is unhealthy.
The repository uses Composer, but no security scanning tool was detected. The missing scanning is a hygiene gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
No repository security policy was found, reducing transparency for reporting and handling vulnerabilities. This is a moderate documentation gap rather than a standalone adoption blocker.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
neos/neos Version ^8.0 || ^9.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.