Package Health

pros/base

The README, MIT license, and small dependency surface make adoption understandable. However, the project has seen no release or repository activity for nearly five years, with no tests or security policy, so future compatibility and maintenance are uncertain.

Latest 0.1.1PackagistPackagist

38%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

50

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

63

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

83

Health Score Breakdown

Release historydanger

Only two releases were published, both in November–December 2021, with no releases in the last 12 months; this is strong evidence of abandonment risk.

Repo commit activitydanger

There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with a project that has not been maintained for nearly five years.

Repo issue activitycaution

There was no issue or pull-request activity in the last month, and one issue remains open; this provides no evidence of active support.

Repo popularitycaution

Four stars, zero forks, and one watcher indicate a very small user and contributor footprint, increasing the risk that defects or compatibility problems remain unattended.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest transparency and maintenance gap.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Leo

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
illuminate/support
Version ^8.0
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
4 years ago
Created
4 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform