Tests, a clear MIT license, and a stable major release improve transparency. The two-release history, no recent commits, and uncertain repository linkage make long-term support difficult to verify.
52%
Total Score
50
100
72
67
Only two releases have been published, with no release in about 2 years and 6 months and a median interval of about 2 years and 3 months. This suggests slow maintenance and lowers confidence in ongoing support.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months. Combined with the old last push, this is evidence of currently inactive maintenance.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. That weakens confidence that the linked source repository belongs to this release.
The repository has 1 star, 0 forks, and 1 watcher. This is limited supporting evidence, though popularity alone is not required for a small stable package.
The repository uses Composer build tooling, which fits the package ecosystem, but no security scanning tools were detected. For this small library, that is a modest hygiene gap rather than a severe risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.