The package has a clear README, repository tests, release notes, and a small dependency footprint. MIT licensing and a matching source repository provide useful transparency, but the limited security and workflow safeguards leave some maintenance risk.
60%
Total Score
50
100
88
75
The package has seven releases, but none in the last 12 months and its latest release was over two years ago. This is meaningful evidence of inactivity for a dependency consumers may need maintained over time.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap and increasing abandonment risk.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool was detected. For a small library this is a hygiene gap rather than a severe dependency risk.
The repository has no security policy, which makes vulnerability-reporting expectations less transparent. This is a modest transparency concern for an otherwise small project.
All eight analyzed action references are unpinned, and two workflows grant top-level write permissions. The audit found no untrusted checkout, injection, or high-severity finding, so this is workflow hygiene risk rather than a severe issue.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.