Package Health

pop-wp-schema/usermeta

This is a generally healthy and actively maintained release: it has 145 releases over roughly 3 years, 33 releases in the last 12 months, a stable non-prerelease version, an active non-archived repository, and recent commits. The organization-owned repository and matching package references provide credible project backing, while the license, tests, Composer build tooling, and absence of install-time scripts support reasonable transparency and operational safety. The main concerns are complete concentration of recent commits in one contributor, no security policy, no security-scanning tooling, and no changelog despite the package documentation referring to one; these are meaningful but do not outweigh the strong release and maintenance history.

Latest 19.2.4PackagistPackagist

78%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

88

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

83

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

90

Health Score Breakdown

Package scaffoldingcaution

The artifact includes a README and the repository has tests, compensating for the absence of packaged test coverage; however, neither artifact nor repository has a changelog, leaving a modest transparency gap.

Repo bus factorcaution

All 14 recent commits came from one contributor, creating a real single-maintainer continuity risk. The organization-owned repository provides some potential handoff capacity, but no second active contributor is evidenced.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher, indicating limited external adoption; this is supporting evidence only and is outweighed by the strong release and commit activity.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected; the missing scanning coverage is a modest supply-chain hygiene gap.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting and response expectations undocumented despite the README providing an email contact.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Leonardo Losoviz

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
pop-wp-schema/meta
Version ^19.2.4
—
—
pop-wp-schema/users
Version ^19.2.4
—
—
pop-cms-schema/usermeta-wp
Version ^19.2.4
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
19 days ago
Created
3 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform