Package Health

pop-wp-schema/block-content-parser

This is a generally healthy and actively maintained release: it has over three years of history, 131 releases including 33 in the last 12 months, a stable non-prerelease version, recent repository activity, clear licensing, tests, and a matching source repository owned by an organization. The main concerns are that all 14 commits in the last three months came from one contributor, the repository has little public popularity, and it lacks a security policy and automated security-scanning tooling. These are meaningful resilience and transparency gaps, but they are outweighed by the strong release cadence, current repository, project backing, and coherent package structure.

Latest 19.2.4PackagistPackagist

78%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

80

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

89

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

90

Health Score Breakdown

Maintainerscaution

Only one registry account has publishing access, which is a resilience concern, although the linked repository is owned by an organization and the strong release history shows that publishing is currently active.

Repo bus factorcaution

One contributor made all 14 commits in the last three months, creating a genuine continuity risk; organization ownership provides some potential handoff capacity but no second active contributor is observed.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has only 1 star, 0 forks, and 1 watcher, indicating limited external adoption or review; this is a supporting caution rather than a health verdict because the package is actively released and maintained.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools are configured, leaving a transparency and automated-detection gap.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, so users are not given a documented vulnerability-reporting process in the repository; the README's email guidance provides partial practical coverage but not a formal policy.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Leonardo Losoviz

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
getpop/engine-wp
Version ^19.2.4
getpop/dom-crawler
Version ^19.2.4

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
14 days ago
Created
3 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform