Package Health

pop-schema/user-roles

This is a mature, actively released package with clear licensing, a matching organization-owned repository, tests, a modest dependency footprint, and recent commit activity. The main concerns are that all recent repository commits come from one contributor, the repository has no security policy or security-scanning tooling, and no changelog was found; these are meaningful transparency and continuity gaps, but they are offset by the package’s long release history, ongoing releases, non-archived repository, and stable versioning. It appears reasonable to depend on, with normal supply-chain and maintainer-continuity review advised.

Latest 19.2.4PackagistPackagist

78%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

80

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

89

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

90

Health Score Breakdown

Repo bus factorcaution

One contributor made all 15 commits in the last 3 months, creating a genuine maintainer-continuity risk. Organization backing provides some potential handoff capacity, but no second active contributor is shown by this signal.

Repo issue activitycaution

There were no new issues or pull requests in the last month and no merged pull requests; this provides little evidence of an active external feedback process, although the null open-issue count limits the conclusion.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has 3 stars, 1 fork, and 1 watcher. This is limited adoption evidence, but popularity is supporting evidence rather than a health verdict and does not outweigh the strong release and commit history.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools are detected. This is a hygiene gap rather than a severe risk, especially because the repository is actively maintained.

Security policycaution

No repository security policy was found. The README gives a security contact address, which is useful compensating evidence, but the absence of a formal policy remains a modest transparency gap.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Leonardo Losoviz

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
pop-cms-schema/users
Version ^19.2.4
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
19 days ago
Created
5 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform