Tests, a matching source tree, and MIT licensing make the package easier to inspect and adopt. Unpinned workflow actions and no security policy leave modest maintenance and build-hygiene gaps.
55%
Total Score
75
78
75
The package has had no release in over five years, despite 13 releases overall and a previously regular median interval of about 40 days. This is substantial evidence of abandonment risk.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap and lowering confidence in ongoing maintenance.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher, indicating little visible adoption. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, so this is only a minor concern.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This modestly reduces assurance around dependency and build hygiene.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency gap for a maintained library, although the inactive project and absence of other workflow findings keep it from being a severe risk alone.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
polus/router Version ^2.0 | — | — |
psr/http-factory Version ^1.0 | — | — |
psr/http-message Version ^1.0 | — | — |
psr/event-dispatcher Version ^1.0 | — | — |
psr/http-server-middleware Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.