The package is clearly licensed and includes a useful README, but it has no security policy and its repository has little visible adoption. Eight workflow actions are unpinned, adding avoidable build-supply-chain maintenance risk.
42%
Total Score
0
75
75
The latest release was about 5 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That long release gap is a meaningful abandonment concern despite 25 historical releases.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the package's roughly 5-year-old release history. This materially lowers confidence in ongoing maintenance.
The repository name matches the package, but its README does not mention the package name. This weakens evidence that the source is documented for this package and adds a modest transparency concern.
The repository has no security policy. For a library handling CA-bundle paths and certificate material, this reduces transparency about reporting and response, with no provided evidence compensating for the gap.
All 8 analyzed action references are unpinned, while the audit found no untrusted checkouts, script injection, or high-severity findings. The clean audit offsets severe workflow concerns, but unpinned actions remain a maintenance and supply-chain hygiene gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.