plusmagic/plus.repeater

The single-maintainer publishing setup is balanced by organization ownership, a matching repository, and a clear README. Its minimal dependency surface and lack of install scripts reduce adoption friction, but the project shows little evidence of ongoing maintenance.

Latest 1.5.2

Packagist

58%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Release history

The package has only 2 releases, with none in the last 12 months, and its latest release was about 18 months ago. This is a meaningful maintenance concern for a dependency, despite the package being a small, focused plugin.

Repo commit activity

There were 0 commits and 0 active maintainers in the last 3 months. Combined with the absence of releases in the last year, this is the strongest evidence that maintenance has slowed or stopped.

Repo popularity

The repository has 1 star and 1 fork, indicating a very small user and contributor footprint. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but the limited external activity offers little resilience if maintenance stops.

Repo tooling

Composer is used as a build tool, but no security scanning tools are present. That is a transparency and maintenance-hygiene gap, though it is less severe for this small browser plugin than for a security-sensitive package.

Security policy

The repository has no security policy. This weakens disclosure transparency, but the absence is a secondary concern for a small front-end utility and does not outweigh the maintenance evidence by itself.