The repository does not clearly match the package, and it has no security policy. MIT licensing and no install-time scripts are helpful, but documentation and testing evidence remain thin.
32%
Total Score
0
57
75
The latest release was published in April 2016, with no releases in the last 12 months despite a package age of about 11 years. This is strong evidence of abandonment for a framework dependency.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the long release gap and leaving no evidence of ongoing maintenance.
The published artifact has no README, while the source project also reports no tests or changelog. Missing tests and changelog are normal for published artifacts, but a framework without consumer documentation is a meaningful integration gap.
The linked repository name does not match the package name, and no README mention was available to establish the connection. That weakens source-to-package transparency.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. Given the package's 13 runtime dependencies, this limits evidence of dependency hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/log Version ~1.0 | — | — |
nesbot/carbon Version ~1 | — | — |
symfony/debug Version ~2.7 | — | — |
duncan3dc/blade Version ~2.2 | — | — |
monolog/monolog Version ~1.16 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.