pianotell/flarum-ext-flamoji

Repo bus factorcaution

Three contributors were active, although the largest contributor made about 68% of recent commits; this is a moderate concentration risk rather than a severe single-maintainer failure.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has only 3 stars and 2 forks, offering little external adoption evidence; low popularity is supporting context, not proof of poor maintenance.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest transparency and preventive-maintenance gap.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, so its process for receiving and handling vulnerability reports is not documented.

Workflow auditcaution

Both workflows were fully analyzed with no audit findings or untrusted-code sinks, but both of the two action references are unpinned, weakening build reproducibility and action supply-chain hygiene.