Clear documentation, release notes, tests, and a recent update make the project straightforward to maintain and integrate. Recent work is concentrated in one contributor, while missing security scanning and unpinned workflow actions add modest operational risk.
78%
Total Score
67
100
94
83
All 2 recent commits came from one contributor, concentrating current maintenance. The organization-owned repository partly offsets the handoff risk but does not remove it.
Only 2 commits were recorded in the last 3 months, so maintenance activity is present but light.
Composer and Phing provide build tooling, but no security-scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest transparency and maintenance gap.
The repository has no security policy, which makes vulnerability-reporting expectations less clear for users and maintainers.
Both workflows were analyzed with no audit findings or untrusted checkouts, but both action references are unpinned and one workflow grants top-level write permissions. These are workflow hygiene concerns rather than severe risks here because no dangerous trigger or injection sink was found.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
composer/installers Version ^1.0 || ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.