The package has tests, a useful README, MIT licensing, and a repository that matches its name. Its focused codebase has one runtime dependency and no install-time scripts.
39%
Total Score
50
100
64
75
The package has only one release, published over 10 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite the absence of registry deprecation.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with a project that has been inactive for over 10 years. This materially increases abandonment risk.
The repository has only 1 star, 0 forks, and 1 watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these numbers provide little evidence of a broad user or maintainer community.
The repository is not archived, which preserves a path for maintenance, but its last push was over 10 years ago and does not offset the inactivity shown elsewhere.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and incident-response gap, although the small, focused package has no other provided security-process evidence to compensate for it.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
phabitat/spl Version 0.* | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.