pfrug/simpleperiod
The small, focused artifact has tests, documentation, an MIT license, and no runtime dependencies. Its solo ownership and absent security tooling leave little visible maintenance capacity.
58%
Total Score
50
100
86
75
Health Score Breakdown
The registry lists one maintainer, and the repository owner is an individual rather than an organization. This leaves a thin visible maintainer base if that person becomes unavailable.
The package has only one release, published about 3 years and 6 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That materially raises abandonment risk.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months. Combined with the single old release, this points to limited current maintenance.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. This is a modest hygiene gap rather than evidence that the release is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy. For a small library this is a transparency gap, though it is less serious than evidence of unsafe release behavior.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 P.Frugone |
Direct Dependencies
No direct dependencies.
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 3 years ago
- Created
- 3 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.