Clear documentation, repository tests, an MIT license, and no install-time scripts reduce adoption friction. The single-person project has little operating history, so pin this exact version and expect change.
65%
Total Score
50
100
79
83
The registry lists one maintainer, consistent with the repository being owned by an individual, but it leaves little demonstrated publishing redundancy for a brand-new package.
The registry namespace and repository belong to the same individual account, so ownership is consistent, though there is no organizational backing shown.
The package is 0 days old and has published seven releases within roughly two hours. That shows active initial development, but provides no evidence of sustained maintenance yet.
There were no commits or active maintainers recorded in the last three months, but the repository was pushed immediately before this assessment and the project is newly published. This is a limited-history concern rather than evidence of abandonment.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency gap, not a severe dependency risk on its own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
laravel/framework Version ^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.