Usable with caveats: the package is licensed, documented, tested, and backed by a matching repository, but it has had no commits or contributor activity for about 10 months and has no security policy. Its single-maintainer, zero-star project is suitable only if you can accept limited evidence of ongoing maintenance.
58%
Total Score
38
100
78
80
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months, consistent with no repository push for about 10 months. This is the main abandonment concern.
Only one registry account has publish access. The matching user-owned repository provides some ownership continuity, but a single publisher leaves limited redundancy if that maintainer becomes unavailable.
The registry namespace and repository owner match, but both are a user-owned project rather than organization-backed. This supports identity continuity without adding organizational maintenance capacity.
There were five releases, including four in the last 12 months, but all releases occurred within roughly 17 minutes on the first release day. This shows initial publishing activity rather than an established release cadence.
There are no open issues or pull requests and no activity in the last month. This is not inherently bad for a small package, but it provides no evidence of an active feedback or maintenance loop.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
socialiteproviders/manager Version ^4.8 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.