Package Health

pengzekuan/wechat

The MIT declaration, matching repository, and repository tests provide basic transparency, and installation has no lifecycle scripts. A single maintainer, no security policy or scanning, and negligible repository activity leave little evidence of ongoing stewardship.

Latest 0.1.1PackagistPackagist

30%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

25

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

75

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

50

Health Score Breakdown

Release historydanger

The latest release was published about 10 years ago, with only two releases overall and none in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence that the package is no longer actively maintained.

Repo commit activitydanger

The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the release history and indicating no recent maintenance capacity.

Maintainerscaution

Only one registry maintainer is listed, leaving a thin publishing base and increasing continuity risk for an already inactive package.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tool was detected. That leaves a modest supply-chain hygiene gap without proving the package is unsafe.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency for reporting and handling vulnerabilities. This is a secondary concern because the dominant risk is the lack of recent maintenance.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

peter

Direct Dependencies

No direct dependencies.

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
10 years ago
Created
10 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform