pavelpage/censorship

The README gives practical installation, usage, and configuration guidance, while the package has a clear MIT license and a minimal dependency profile. Its small scope may explain the lack of tests, but there is no evidence of recent maintenance or security practice.

Latest 1.0.0

Packagist

38%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Release history

The package has only one release, published about eight years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence that maintenance has stopped.

Repo commit activity

The repository had no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap and indicating negligible current maintenance capacity.

Repo issue activity

There were no recent issues or pull requests, so there is no visible current support activity. With a small package this is only supporting evidence, not abandonment proof by itself.

Repo tooling

Composer is used as the build tool, but no security scanning tooling is present. The standard build tooling is positive; the missing scanning is a minor hygiene gap.

Security policy

The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting or handling vulnerabilities. This is a transparency gap, though it is less severe than the maintenance signals.