It includes tests, a usable README, and a small runtime dependency footprint. Organization backing and a non-archived repository help, but the lack of security tooling leaves maintenance visibility limited.
38%
Total Score
50
100
75
75
The package has only one release, published over 12 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This strongly indicates abandonment risk despite the stable 1.0.0 version.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, following a last push over 12 years ago. This is strong evidence that maintenance has stopped.
No recognized license declaration or license file was found in the package or repository. The README mentions GPL V2, but that is not represented as a detected license artifact in this signal.
The repository uses Composer, showing basic build tooling, but it has no security scanning tools. The missing scanning is a maintenance hygiene gap rather than evidence of immediate unfitness.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting or handling vulnerabilities. This matters more for a package with no recent maintenance activity.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
papaya/cms-core Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.