Documentation and release notes are useful, and the dependency footprint is modest. The main remaining concern is that recent work comes from one contributor, while workflow hardening is incomplete.
84%
Total Score
83
100
100
50
One contributor made all four commits in the last 3 months, creating a real concentration risk despite the organization's ability to provide some backing.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations and response contacts unclear.
All 6 analyzed action references are unpinned and one workflow has top-level write permissions, both meaningful hardening gaps. The reported cache-poisoning finding is low confidence, so it is hygiene rather than a severe risk; the audit itself analyzed all workflows successfully.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
palmtree/html Version ^5.0 | — | — |
palmtree/argparser Version ^3.0 | — | — |
palmtree/nameconverter Version ^3.0 | — | — |
symfony/http-foundation Version ^6.4||^7.4||^8.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.