The MIT license, matching repository, and lack of install-time scripts provide useful baseline transparency. One maintainer, no tests or security scanning, and minimal community activity increase the risk of relying on it.
38%
Total Score
25
100
75
75
The package has had no release in nearly 7 years and none in the last 12 months, despite 21 releases overall; this is strong evidence of abandonment risk.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers over the last 3 months, consistent with the long release gap and leaving little evidence of ongoing maintenance.
Only one registry publishing account is listed. As a user-owned project rather than organization-backed software, this creates a thin maintainer base and higher continuity risk.
The repository has 8 stars, 0 forks, and 1 watcher, providing little community evidence or backup capacity if maintenance stops.
Composer is used for the build, but no security scanning tools are present. For a package that handles application routes and documentation, this is a modest transparency and maintenance gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^6.3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.