The project has had no commits or active maintainers for three months, and the linked repository does not identify this package. A clear license, detailed README, and GitHub release provide useful transparency, but pinning this version warrants caution.
55%
Total Score
50
69
50
The repository is owned by an individual user rather than an organization, so the single registry maintainer does not have organizational backing to offset the thin maintenance evidence.
The package is only 104 days old with two releases, the latest about 101 days ago; this is too little history to establish durable maintenance, though the initial releases were close together.
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, which is a meaningful maintenance concern for a package with only two releases.
The repository name does not match the package and its README does not mention the package, so the source-to-package relationship is not clearly established.
The repository has no stars, forks, or watchers. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these counters provide no additional maturity signal.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
orangecat/core Version * | — | — |
magento/framework Version * | — | — |
orangecat/module-company Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.