Tests, a readme, and a changelog support adoption, and the repository is active rather than archived. There is no security policy, so transparency remains limited.
67%
Total Score
67
100
88
83
The manifest declares MIT, but the artifact license detector identifies LGPL-3.0 while a license file is present. The package is licensed, but the unresolved mismatch creates a real adoption and compliance concern.
All recent repository activity came from one contributor, giving the project a narrow recent maintenance base. Organization backing provides some handoff capacity, so this is a caution rather than a severe risk.
Only 1 commit was recorded in the last 3 months, which is thin recent maintenance activity for a payment integration. The recent release and repository push provide some compensating evidence but do not remove the concern.
Composer is used for builds, showing basic build tooling, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a modest transparency gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The linked repository has no security policy. For a WooCommerce payment plugin, the absence limits guidance for reporting and handling security issues.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nesbot/carbon Version ^2.62 | — | — |
tightenco/collect Version ^8.68 | — | — |
rappasoft/laravel-helpers Version ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.