The code is tiny and has only one runtime dependency, limiting its maintenance surface. It has a valid MIT declaration and is not deprecated or archived, but the project has had no activity since 2017 and offers no security policy.
42%
Total Score
50
100
79
83
Only one registry account has publishing access. Individual ownership can be normal for a small package, but it leaves little visible publishing redundancy alongside the lack of recent activity.
The repository is owned by an individual account rather than an organization, so there is no visible organizational backing to offset the single-release history and prolonged inactivity.
This package has only one release, published over 9 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of abandonment, though the small package scope may reduce the need for frequent releases.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the release history and indicating that maintenance has stopped.
The repository uses Composer, which fits the package ecosystem, but has no security-scanning tooling. That is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than a standalone severe risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
snilius/twig-sort-by-field Version ^0.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.