Its license is clear and the repository is backed by an organization, but all three workflow actions are unpinned. The package also lacks a README and security policy, making adoption and security reporting less transparent.
57%
Total Score
75
80
75
The artifact has no README, which makes a library harder to integrate, while missing tests and a changelog are normal for published artifacts. A GitHub release exists for this version, partly offsetting the documentation gap.
The latest release was about eight years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of stale maintenance, although the repository remains available and is not archived.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. This reinforces the long release gap and raises abandonment risk.
The repository has no security policy, so there is no documented route for reporting vulnerabilities. This is a modest transparency and maintenance gap.
The workflow was fully analyzed and found no dangerous triggers or audit findings, but all 3 of 3 action references are unpinned. That leaves avoidable build-integrity exposure and is a hygiene caution.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
oat-sa/tao-core Version >=18.1.0||dev-develop | — | — |
solarium/solarium Version ~3.6 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.