Tests, licensing, and organization backing provide useful support, while the repository remains active rather than archived. Workflow references are all unpinned, and no security policy is published, leaving avoidable maintenance and build-integrity gaps.
62%
Total Score
67
100
94
67
The package has a substantial history of 94 releases since 2016, but it had no registry releases in the last 12 months despite a median interval of about 14 days. That is a meaningful sign of slowed maintenance.
All one recent commit came from a single contributor, leaving no demonstrated contributor redundancy in the measured period. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity, but no second active contributor is shown.
Only one commit was recorded in the last three months, indicating very limited recent development activity. This conflicts with the repository's recent push and organization backing but still lowers maintenance confidence.
The repository has no published security policy. This is a transparency gap for reporting and handling vulnerabilities, although it is not evidence of a vulnerability itself.
All three workflows were analyzed without high-confidence findings or untrusted checkouts, and none grants top-level write access. However, all seven action references are unpinned, leaving workflow dependencies exposed to tag or branch changes.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
qtism/qtism Version ~0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.