This release appears generally healthy and reasonable to depend on: it is actively released, currently stable, not deprecated, backed by a non-archived organization-owned repository, and has strong documentation, tests, changelog coverage, licensing, security policy, and dependency automation. The main concerns are a single active repository contributor over the last 3 months and workflow permission hygiene, including one workflow with top-level write access and several without explicit top-level permissions; these warrant review but do not outweigh the clear maintenance and project-structure evidence.
78%
Total Score
80
100
100
80
Six workflows were analyzed; one uses pull_request_target and another performs an untrusted checkout, but no script injection was detected. These patterns merit workflow review without constituting a severe finding by themselves.
One contributor produced 100% of the 13 commits over the last 3 months, creating a real continuity risk; organization backing provides some handoff potential but no second active contributor is evidenced.
There were 13 commits in the last 3 months, showing recent work, although all activity is concentrated in one active maintainer.
Five of six workflows lack top-level permissions declarations, and one workflow has top-level write access; although job-level permissions exist in four workflows, the configuration is weaker than least-privilege hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.