The project has a very small release history and no commits in the last three months. Build tooling and Dependabot are present, but the repository mismatch, license inconsistency, and install-time scripts warrant checking before adoption.
51%
Total Score
50
100
75
50
The artifact contains an MIT license file, but the manifest declares the package proprietary; that mismatch should be resolved before dependency adoption.
Composer install, update, and project-creation scripts run during package operations, increasing installation complexity and the code that should be reviewed.
The repository is owned by an individual account rather than an organization, so there is no visible organizational backing to compensate for the thin maintenance record.
Only two releases exist across about two and a half years, with one release in the last 12 months and a median interval of about 620 days, indicating a thin maintenance record.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package, raising uncertainty about whether it is the intended source repository.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
sylius/sylius Version ^1.12 || ^1.13 || ^1.14 | — | — |
niiph/sylius-common Version ^0.1.0 | — | — |
sylius/mailer-bundle Version ^1.8 || ^2.0@beta | — | — |
symfony/webpack-encore-bundle Version ^1.15 || ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.