Recent releases, a matching repository, tests, release notes, and a clear license provide useful maintenance and transparency. The small audience, no commits in the last three months, absent security policy, and unpinned workflow actions leave meaningful upkeep and build-integrity caveats.
68%
Total Score
75
88
75
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, despite a release about four months ago. This leaves a meaningful question about current maintenance capacity.
The repository has only one star and four forks, indicating a small user and contributor footprint. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but this limits external confidence in the project.
Composer is used as the build tool, but no security scanning tool was detected. For a small library this is a hygiene gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The repository has no security policy, so it gives maintainers and users no documented process for reporting or handling vulnerabilities.
The workflow audit completed successfully with no reported findings or dangerous triggers, but all three action references are unpinned. The workflow also lacks a top-level permissions block, which is acceptable on its own, while unpinned actions remain a supply-chain hygiene gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nguyenanhung/slug-helper Version ^3.0 || ^2.0 | — | — |
nguyenanhung/escape-helper Version ^3.0 || ^2.0 | — | — |
nguyenanhung/nanoid-helper Version ^2.0 | — | — |
nguyenanhung/hashids-helper Version ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.