Nearly three years without a registry release or recent repository commits limits confidence in ongoing maintenance. The organization-backed repository has tests, a matching package, and a stable release, but its workflows use unpinned actions and include an archived action.
58%
Total Score
83
100
83
75
The latest release was nearly three years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months, despite a history of 17 releases. This indicates stalled maintenance and lowers confidence in future fixes.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap. This is a real maintenance concern, though the repository remains available and unarchived.
Composer is used for builds, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a hygiene gap, not evidence that the release is unsafe by itself.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations undocumented. This weakens transparency for a maintained dependency.
All 9 analyzed action references are unpinned, and the audit found a high-confidence medium-severity archived action in the release workflow. The workflows had no dangerous triggers or untrusted checkouts, which limits the impact.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
netcommons/m17n Version @dev | — | — |
netcommons/files Version @dev | — | — |
netcommons/rooms Version @dev | — | — |
netcommons/users Version @dev | — | — |
cakedc/migrations Version ~2.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.