Organization backing and a security policy add useful continuity, while all recent commits come from one maintainer. The workflow audit found no dangerous findings, though both referenced actions are unpinned.
82%
Total Score
83
100
94
100
All 8 recent commits came from one contributor, creating a real continuity risk despite the repository being owned by an organization.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected; this is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, script injection, or audit findings. Both of its two action references are unpinned, which is a supply-chain hygiene caution.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
neos/flow Version ^8.0 || ^9.0 | — | — |
neos/fusion Version ^8.0 || ^9.0 | — | — |
neos/fusion-afx Version ^8.0 || ^9.0 | — | — |
psr/http-factory Version * | — | — |
neos/utility-arrays Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.