neogive/lumen-captcha

The initial release is documented on GitHub, and the repository remains available rather than archived. Composer dependencies and install behavior are straightforward, but consumer documentation, security-policy coverage, and license consistency need attention.

Latest 1.1

Packagist

42%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

License

The package declares MIT and includes a license file, so it is licensed, but the detected Apache-2.0 text does not match the declaration. Consumers should resolve which license applies.

Package scaffolding

The package has no README, while its GitHub release notes document the initial project; missing consumer documentation is a real integration gap for a library, though tests and changelogs are not expected in the published artifact.

Release history

This is the package's only release, published about 8 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.

Repo popularity

The repository has 0 stars and 0 forks, providing little supporting evidence of adoption or community maintenance. Low popularity alone is not decisive, but it reinforces the other maturity concerns.

Security policy

The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and maintenance gap, especially for a package that handles CAPTCHA and image-related functionality.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

xuao

Direct Dependencies

Dependency	Last Release	Score
illuminate/config Version ~5.0	—	—
illuminate/hashing Version ~5.0	—	—
illuminate/support Version ~5.0	—	—
intervention/image Version ~2.2	—	—
illuminate/filesystem Version ~5.0	—	—