The license files disagree, and the repository recorded no commits in the last three months. A recent release, a clear package structure, and repository tests provide useful maintenance evidence, but verify licensing before adoption.
68%
Total Score
50
100
93
83
The manifest declares MIT, while the artifact license file is detected as WTFPL; although a license is present, the mismatch creates a genuine licensing transparency concern.
The repository had zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, which suggests limited recent development activity. The recent release and repository push provide some compensating evidence, but not enough to remove the concern.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented. This is a modest transparency gap rather than a severe dependency risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/support Version ^5.8|^6.0|^7.0|^8.0|^9.0|^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.