The license records disagree, and the repository has no security policy. The README is useful and the package is not deprecated or archived, but maintenance evidence is too old for a dependable new dependency.
38%
Total Score
25
75
75
This is the package's only release, published about nine years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That strongly limits evidence of ongoing maintenance.
The repository had zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, while its last push was about seven years ago. This is strong evidence of inactive maintenance.
The manifest declares CC BY-SA 3.0, while the repository license file is recognized as MIT. The mismatch creates uncertainty about which terms govern this release.
Only one registry maintainer is listed. The repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed, so there is little visible publishing redundancy if that maintainer stops responding.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these counters provide no meaningful community-maintenance signal.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.