The small release history and no recent commits leave limited evidence of ongoing support. Clear licensing, tests, documentation, release notes, and a matching repository make the package straightforward to evaluate and adopt.
65%
Total Score
50
100
90
75
One registry maintainer is consistent with an individually owned project, but it provides little redundancy if that maintainer becomes unavailable.
The package has only two releases, with the latest about 17 months ago and no releases in the last 12 months. This limits evidence of continued maintenance, though the release history is not itself a deprecation signal.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, reinforcing the lack of recent maintenance evidence.
The repository has no security policy. For a small, low-complexity library this is a modest transparency gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, sinks, or audit findings. However, both of its two action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.