The small contributor footprint and lack of a security policy add adoption risk. Clear licensing, tests, and release notes make the package easier to evaluate, but pin this version and plan for ownership if it needs updates.
55%
Total Score
0
79
83
The latest release was over six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of inactivity, although the package has a history of eight releases.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap. The repository is not archived, which partly offsets abandonment risk but does not restore current maintenance.
The repository has only 2 stars and 2 forks, providing little evidence of broad community review or backup support. Low popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict by itself.
No security policy was found, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations unclear. This is a genuine transparency gap for a library that processes PDF files.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
symfony/process Version ^4|^5 | — | — |
symfony/filesystem Version ^4|^5 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.