The documentation is largely boilerplate, and the project has no tests or security policy. Its MIT license, changelog, and matching repository provide some transparency, but the release appears effectively abandoned.
43%
Total Score
0
70
75
The package has had only two releases, both on the same day, and none in the last 12 months; the latest release is about two years and five months old. This strongly raises abandonment risk.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap. The repository is not archived, but there is no observed recent maintenance.
A README, changelog, and GitHub release notes are present, but the README is largely boilerplate and the package has no tests. The changelog and release notes partly compensate for the documentation weakness, but not the lack of validation evidence.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting or handling vulnerabilities. This is a transparency and maintenance gap, though it is less severe than the inactivity evidence.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/support Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.