It has a substantial README, repository tests, a clear MIT license, and organization backing. The short release history and lack of security scanning or a security policy leave less evidence of long-term maturity.
67%
Total Score
75
100
88
67
Only two releases exist over roughly eight months, so the project has limited evidence of sustained maintenance despite a recent release.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the three months measured. For a package only about eight months old, this is a meaningful maintenance concern.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest transparency and maintenance gap.
The repository has no security policy, so users have no documented reporting process or stated security-maintenance expectations.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, or audit findings, but both of its two action references are unpinned, weakening build reproducibility.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/console Version ^11.0|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ^11.0|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
illuminate/database Version ^11.0|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.