The package has clear documentation, tests, a matching MIT license, and a small dependency surface. Its release and commit activity is currently quiet, while workflow references are unpinned and no security policy is published.
68%
Total Score
50
100
88
75
The registry namespace and repository are both owned by the same individual, so the package has direct ownership alignment but no organizational backing. This leaves a relatively narrow maintenance base.
The project is mature, with releases dating back to 2016, but it has made no release in the last 12 months and has only seven releases overall. This indicates a real maintenance concern, though the latest release is recent enough that abandonment is not established.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Together with no release in the last 12 months, this lowers confidence in ongoing maintenance.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. For a small library this is a modest transparency and maintenance gap, not evidence of an unsafe release by itself.
No security policy is published in the repository. That makes vulnerability reporting and response expectations less transparent, although the repository's tests and documentation provide some compensating project structure.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.