A four-file codebase has no tests or security policy, and its single maintainer provides little support evidence. The MIT declaration and matching repository make its provenance clear, but they do not offset the long maintenance gap.
38%
Total Score
50
56
50
The latest release was about 6 years and 10 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months; this is strong evidence of abandonment risk.
The complete tree contains only four files, including one source file and no test suite, showing a very small and lightly developed project.
A readable README is present, but the package and repository have no tests or changelog. Missing tests materially reduce confidence for a small library, while the missing changelog is normal packaging practice.
There are no open issues or pull requests and no recent issue or pull-request activity; alongside the old last release, this supports a conclusion of very limited ongoing maintenance.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher, offering no meaningful community evidence to offset the single-maintainer, inactive-project profile.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.